View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0004032 | 10000-007: Profiles | Spec | public | 2017-10-25 18:58 | 2020-03-04 20:49 |
Reporter | Paul Hunkar | Assigned To | Karl Deiretsbacher | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | closed | Resolution | won't fix | ||
Summary | 0004032: Secure channels vs Sessions | ||||
Description | The profiles describe the minimum number of session for certain profiles, but it does not describe the minimum by number of secure channels that should be provided. This should also be included in the profile. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Commit Version | |||||
Fix Due Date | |||||
|
When defining the minimum number of secure channels for the nano and micro embedded profiles please consider that the TCP connection for each secure channel requires one send and one receive buffer with minimum size 8192 bytes according to the OPC UA TCP Hello/Acknowledgement messages of Part 6 Mappings. Adding multiple secure channels makes the memory usage growing quickly for an embedded resource constrained device. |
|
Discussed in UA Meeting 2020-03-04: The number of SecureChannels is server specific and is not mandated. |
|
Agreed to no-fix in Dallas meeting. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2017-10-25 18:58 | Paul Hunkar | New Issue | |
2017-10-27 06:05 | jgr | Note Added: 0008615 | |
2017-10-27 06:06 | jgr | Note Edited: 0008615 | |
2017-11-01 03:11 | Paul Hunkar | Description Updated | |
2018-01-23 17:58 | Jim Luth | Assigned To | => Karl Deiretsbacher |
2018-01-23 17:58 | Jim Luth | Status | new => assigned |
2020-03-04 20:16 | Karl Deiretsbacher | Status | assigned => resolved |
2020-03-04 20:16 | Karl Deiretsbacher | Resolution | open => won't fix |
2020-03-04 20:16 | Karl Deiretsbacher | Note Added: 0011651 | |
2020-03-04 20:49 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
2020-03-04 20:49 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0011659 |